Pages

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Resolutions passed on 28 Nov

RESOLUTIONS PASSED AT JAN SANSAD
28th NOVEMBER 2012

State Responsibility for Social Security and Basic Services

Resolutions on Education

Education Budget to be made 6% of GDP as long, long recommended by Kothari Commission in 1966! Centre-State distribution of financial shares for RTE to be revised so as to enable States to meet Constitution obligation of 86th Amendment. A finance note detailing the allocations for all aspects of the RTE needs to be prepared. State, district and school level allocations should be determined through need based decentralized planning rather than be determined on the basis standardized norms.
  • No extension of deadlines in RTE
  • Capacities – human and financial - of local authorities [Panchayat and urban bodies] to be increased so as to enable them to perform the roles mandated to them under RTE.
  • Institutionalize social audits that will be conducted at least once a year. Social audits will be part of the overall process and performance audit of all programmes under the RTE. Social audits to be part of the larger grievance redress architecture and mechanisms.
  • Community led monitoring of school to be strengthened through SMCs and panchayats. Concurrent monitoring mechanisms to be put in place. Increase per school allocation for monitoring from the current RS 50/school/annum.
  • Grievance Redress [architecture and mechanism] to be put into place and budgets to be allocated accordingly; Accountability for provision of all legal entitlements under the Act to be fixed within Education Department for this purpose.
  • A Framework for Equity to be devised with precise programmatic and budgetary allocations that are tracked and monitored by an independent agency; Under RTE detailed Guidelines for Discrimination to be framed.
  • All the adult education programmes are implemented in the project mode and there is no systematic investment in developing the infrastructure or institutions for sustained efforts. Thus increased resources allocations and their utilization is an urgent need to make adult education sustainable and meaningful for people.
  • Continuing education in tune of lifelong learning has to be planned and implemented across country without the boundaries of time and region.
  • Pre-schooling [3-6 years age group] to be included under RTE.
  • Governments’ responsibility towards education to be realized fully. Attempts at privatization to be desisted; Regulation of norms, quality and compliance with 25% reservation under RTE to be strictly followed

BGVS, Nirantar Trust (Delhi UP), JOSH (Delhi), Centre for Equity Studies (Delhi Bihar),  AMIED (Rajasthan), ASTHA (Rajasthan)

Resolutions on NREGA
Bank accounts must not be made mandatory for getting NREGA employment
Workers must not be denied employment under the NREGA if they do not possess a post office or bank account. States like Bihar have issued instructions making bank accounts mandatory to seeking employment under NREGA. In states where banking infrastructure is poor, this will only create another hurdle in programme implementation and deny workers of their entitlements under the Act. While the opening of bank accounts may be prioritized it must not be made mandatory.

Keep UID out of NREGA
If the issue of new job cards is linked to UID enrolment, there is a danger of creating a jam that would disrupt the programme. The process of job cards renewal, in any case a slow process, will be further slowed down. Many people are likely to be denied their entitlement to 100 days of work as they will be without a job card.  Further, in spite of the hiring of "service providers", the entire administrative machinery is likely to be diverted into capturing of biometrics or supervising "service providers". The scale of MGNREGA works is bound to suffer. This would be a gross injustice to NREGA workers, who are already deprived of their basic entitlements. The proposal of "biometric attendance at the worksite with GPS coordinates" is completely impractical - many NREGA worksites are in remote areas with poor or no connectivity.

Wages paid under NREGA to be linked to minimum wages and adjusted to the inflation rate
Paying less than minimum wages to NREGA workers is a violation of the constitutional rights of poor workers and the Minimum Wages Act of 1940 and amounts to forced labour. Section 6(1) and 6(2) of the NREGA must be amended to ensure there is no conflict with the Minimum Wages Act.
Further, minimum wages under NREGA must be linked to the Consumer Price Index of Agricultural Labourers (CPI-AL)

Extend minimum guarantee of 100 days of employment to every worker
The current guarantee of 100 days per household is inadequate to provide livelihood security to the rural poor. The guarantee must shift from a family based entitlement to an individual entitlement.

All states must notify rules for section 25 of the Act
Section 25 of the NREGA for imposing fines on implementation authorities for non-compliance must be immediately notified. In the absence of such rules accountability for designated responsibilities under the act is being circumvented.  Also in the absence of rules for imposing fines, state government are only able to take steps such as suspension or FIRs which prove counterproductive to the implementation of the programme.

Safeguard basic provisions of the Act
The problem of unmet demand is rampant in the poorest states of the country which need employment under the programme the most. This coupled with delayed payments where employment has been provided is crippling the NREGA. Basic provisions of the Act are being flouted across states such as non-payment of unemployment allowance against unmet demand and payment of delayed wage payment compensation. Rules to implement basic provisions of the Act such as payment of unemployment allowance on not meeting work demand and delayed wage payment compensation must be notified.

States to take immediate steps on implementing NREGA Social Audit Rules
Social Audit rules approved by the CAG are not being implemented in most states. The first step in operationalising its provisions is the setting up of an independent social audit directorate. All states must set up directorates and bring social audit rules into effect immediately.

Protection of whistleblowers
With numerous cases of repression of and violence against NREGA activists trying to secure the basic rights of workers under the programme, there is an urgent need to pass the whistleblower protection Bill.

Resolutions on Pensions
Universal pensions with exclusions
  • Pension should be an individual entitlement for all citizens of India
  • Universal and non contributory old age pension not less than Rs.2000 per month or 50% of the minimum age,whichever is higher should be paid out of the national budget
  • Indexation of pensions so that the amount increases proportionate to inflation
  • Eligibility for pension to be reduced to 55 years for men and 50 years for women and 45 years for highly vulnerable groups (Vulnerable Tribal Groups, Transgender, Women Compelled to become Sex Workers, PWDs)
  • A single window system for Old Age Pensions and a separate ministry for issues of the Elderly
  • Freedom to continue working even after attaining the age of eligibility for universal old age pension
  • Pension is the only benefit that we accept as a cash transfer
  • Income tax payees and government employees should be excluded from universal pensions

Jan Sansad Press Release - 28 Nov 12


Press Release

Jan Sansad Critical of Cash Transfer Scheme

Delhi, 28 November, 2012:  On the third day of the Jan Sansad, which has been focusing on the issues of basic entitlements and services such as livelihood, education, ration, health and water privatization and the government’s move to implement a cash transfer scheme, community members demanded that immediate attention be given to the concerns of  unorganized workers and the poor.

“Even after the passing of the Right to Education Act, education is not an entitlement for us,” asserted Sukhbai, Lalitpur, Bundhelkhand Taking this forward, Kiran Bhatty, former Commissioner, NCPCR, pointed out that for the first time a landmark legislation like the Right to Education was passed without a finance note accompanying it. She went on to add that it was not surprising that they (the government) are not “putting their money where their mouth is.”

In his address, Dr. Praveen Jha emphasized the fact that the Constitutional guarantee of Right to Education can become a reality only if it is adequately resourced. “The government’s failure to fulfil the commitment of allocating 6% of GDP to education, which was recommended by the Kothari Commission in 1966, is irrefutable proof of the utter lack of political will on the part of successive governments to take this basic right to communities most in need of it.”

Speaking on behalf of poor women, Rambhai, from Chambal, in Madhya Pradesh, shared her heartrending experience of being forced to live from hand to mouth. “I am neither able to till my small patch of land as local goons have taken possession of it nor am I given a job card under MNREGA. How does the government expect me to feed and raise my children?” she asked.

From all accounts the situation of urban poor women was no better. Waste pickers from Pune lamented the privatisation of the landfill which has completely deprived them of all means of livelihood. “Till two years ago I used to go to the landfill everyday to sift the waste and sell it to make a living but today I am not allowed to enter the vicinity of the landfill and I am driven away mercilessly”, said Gangu Bai Bansode, from Pune, to the large crowd of people present at Jantar Mantar, in New Delhi.

Poornima Chikarmane, Kagad Kach Patra Kashtakari Panchayat, Pune, agreed that poor women were most affected by the privatization of waste management and the use of contract labour. She then went on to explain that, “contractors were taking away the only means of livelihood for thousands of rag-pickers of Pune. What is worse is that all the big companies contracted to take care of waste management are not able to deliver, much to the dismay of citizens in big metros like Bengaluru.”

A delegation from the Jan Sansad met Shri V. Narayanasamy Minister, Department of Personnel and Training, to highlight their concerns. The Minister has assured them that he will pay due attention to their issues. One of their main concerns is the grievance redress legislations like the Grievance Redress bill, Lokpal bill and Whistle Blower Protection bill.

With regard to the cash transfer scheme two professors of Economics, Prof. Ravi Srivastava and Prof. Pravin Jha, have opined that the scheme will not work in countries that have large poor and marginal populations that are dependent on public provisioning for basic entitlements such as healthcare, food and education.

Prof. Ravi Srivastava said, “It is not a bad idea to give Aadhar cards but before they start to implement this scheme they must realise that there are millions of unorganized migrant workers who have neither basic entitlements nor any guarantees of citizenship.”  Taking this point forward Prof. Pravin Jha said, “While the Aadhar card is location specific migrant workers are multi-locational. The cash transfer will neither benefit the poor nor the government.  It will only enrich the private sector.  As an economist I can safely say it is also bad economics.”

Dr. Ritika Khera, Economist, also questioned the efficacy of the cash transfer system.  She opined that the government was blindly imitating countries like Brazil “without realising that they have fewer poor people, are far more urbanized and have in place a robust banking system”.

The cash transfer scheme was also condemned by CPI (M) MP Brinda Karat and BJP MP Prakash Javadekar.  Brinda Karat, while expressing strong opposition to the Aadhar card, said that they cannot make Aadhar cards conditionality for MNREGA because it can result in a distorted database. “Fingerprinting is not foolproof and it can change with age and manual work”, she added. Prakash Javadekar expressed his support to the people at the Jan Sansad and said that he had submitted a petition in Parliament on pension.

Maharashra MPs Shri Bhuasaheb and Shri Wakchaure, from the Shiv Sena were present at the Jan Sansad as also Shri. Hussain Dalwai, from the Congress and Shri Raju Shetty, from Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana. They have all extended their support to the Jan Sansad.

Others present included Ms. Medha Patkar, Shri Mathew Cherian, Help Age and Ms. Annie Raja, NFIW.

-----------------
For more details please contact:
Farah: 9560511667 and Poornima 09422317928